| The life and work of Charles Darwin have provided a tremendous input for our understanding of the creation, maintenance, and transformation of life on Earth. Today, scientists like Dan Burisch are making new discoveries in the evolution of species, formulating new theories around this topic, and designing experiments to gain knowledge about the manifestation of physical life on our planet. Below are several cases, events, and discoveries which have provided WTTU with inspiration to ask Dan Burisch some of the questions in the interview above. These pieces of evidence do not form complete theories, but merely present fragments of knowledge which can assist us in looking at the big picture of the evolution of life on Earth. To start, it is important to mention that there have been 5 mass extinctions on Earth before now: Cretaceous (about 65 million years ago), Triassic (about 208 million years ago), Permian (about 245 million years ago), Devonian (about 360 million years ago), and Ordovician (about 438 million years ago). It is currently believed that we live during the 6th mass extinction. The current rate of the extinction of species on Earth is as high as it was during the dinosaur extinction. For more information, see Linda Moulton Howe's news releases on this subject at her website (http://www. earthfiles.com/). The following are the current worldwide statistics for life facing extinction (http: //news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3667300.stm): - 1 bird in 8 - 13% of flowering plants - 1/4 of all mammals - 50% of amphibians The evidence that human beings were here prior to primates can be found from archeological sources: golden chains encased in coal measured to be 260-320 million years old, iron nails in rock breed at least 387 million years old, and human bones found to be fossilized in rock 286 million years old. These are just a tiny glimpse into some discoveries made in archeology that have really stumped researchers. See Michael Baigent's books for more details. In terms of human remains with significant height variations compared to modern humans, more information can be found at http://www.stevequayle.com/. Following are some more details from Michael Baigent's research. In 1969 in Texas Stan Taylor discovered a set of human footprints among an area well-known for many dinosaur footprints. Also lots of cave art throughout the world portraying dinosaurs of various species. Professor Amaniyazov from Turkmenistan discovered in 1983 human footprints in rock breed esitmated to be 150 million years old. 1922, John Reid discovered human SHOEPRINTS in Nevada left in rock 213-248 million years old. Also, shoeprints have been found in Utah which are estimated to be 505-590 million years old. These are discoveries that have never been claimed to be hoaxes or the work of charlatans... they are just quietly kept in basements of museums, far away from scientific journals, because they threaten all our careful theories of primate-to-human evolution. Evidence of humans coming from space to Earth is well-documented over the past 100 years in works by people like Erich Von Daniken and Robert Bauval, based mostly on myths, legends, and religious/historical traditions worldwide. Some of the details can be argued, but overall, many of the world's cultural traditions portray ancient visitors from space who gave knowledge and civilization to specific cultures worldwide. The interbreeding of men and animals is a more esoteric subject and WTTU's knowledge of it comes from beings who have a broader view of things here on Earth. According to information uncovered from Himalayan sources, it was a big problem with Lemurians (who did it unknowingly, since they were not fully evolved humans yet) and Atlanteans (who did it with full knowledge of the consequences), and this has marked us until today, which can be seen in our societal fear of genetically altering animals. The possibilities of human existence are vast. It has been said by a certain Ascended Master, known as the Master of the Key, that if the highest potential of humanity was the Sun, the typical person on Earth holds only a thimbleful of light, but even that is already a great deal - it is revolutionary. When a human being completes the planetary set of experiences outlined in the Kabbalah and the Tarot Deck among others, as well as similar systems like the I-Ching, they are given a choice by the Higher Beings: go forth and explore the Universe, or come back to Earth to help mankind. Right now, many beings who have ascended their Awareness past planetary evolution are coming to Earth and are being born as humans, as well as doing various forms of more temporary extraterrestrial visitation. That's why any attempt to create an artificial power structure imposed on everyone, be it MJ-12 or the 5 Councils of the Illuminati, or any number of groups of people, is impossible. Lemuria and Atlantis fell, and so did Rome, and so has the American Empire. Order will come naturally in a way summarised by the quote "think globally, act locally". The lineages of transmission of Sacred Teaching on Earth are thousands of years in the making, and they are the sacrifice of thousands of years, thousands of bodies, thousands of cycles of existence! The harmony of the One is Unified, so its the whole cosmos that sings the verses of God. The Ascended Spirits said that those here on Earth who are Beacons of Light and Workers of Peace must listen to the Sacred Teachings and accurately transcribe the knowledge that will set people free, as in prior ages. Hearing the call, the servants of the Universe stationed on Earth set to work. 26/02/09 |
| Vishvasattva: Dr. Burisch, what is the future of biodiversity on Earth? Are we effectively in the midst of a Mass Extinction event, the scale of which has been matched only by five other such great extinctions (Cretaceous, Triassic, Permian, Devonian, and Ordovician) throughout the Earth's history? What do you believe is the future of the evolution of species on this planet? Dan: To the issue of a Sixth Mass Extinction... I am on record indicating that I am persuaded by evidence that we have likely entered such an event. While the mathematical attributes may be argued...against...for instance...whether this is a fluctuation within what may be ultimately termed part of background extinction...I think we have certainly seen enough to begin immediately pointing ourselves (policy wise, internationally) to protect as many affected (or potentially affected) dependent and individual species/genera. To refuse, in my opinion, is to abdicate any notion of the honest stewardship of humanity within this biosphere. Now...the question of where "things go" is a loaded one...and I have every confidence that you "know it." In the spirit of "thinking globally and acting locally", I should suggest this... We...the perceived physical living matter...are known to share something in common: the genetic code. This "code," this system, is a balanced act (an agency) through Beauty. In that Beauty is found an attribute of supersymmetry. See "A Supersymmetric Model for the Evolution of the Genetic Code" by Bashford, Tsohantjis, and Jarvis; PNAS, Volume 95, Issue 3, 987-992, February 2, 1998 - an already decade's old reference! Speaking within the borderline of Metaphysics - and my chosen professional field - as the question kindly asks "...what do you believe is the future of..." As God is as immutable as internally decided within Unity, so too we will find that the expression of patterns within the biota of the planet, will continue to follow the progressive allowance of variation (including being witness to dissipative structures over many scales)...through a combination of both gradual evolution (phyletic-type) of living species, via Natural Selection, and through a couple heretofore fully unrealized mechanisms which "look like" saltation. The late Stephen Jay Gould did an excellent job at attempting to qualify (and where he could, "quantify") a phenomenon he and Eldredge termed "Punctuated Equilibrium," where a variant of Mayr's geographic (really allopatric) speciation, was proposed as a mechanism to describe what they (in my opinion) presented as an answer to what appears (superficially) as saltation over the fossil record. (Speaking in geometric terms, mostly as metaphor: where Darwin would have presented a "cube" {for instance} as an answer to Evolution, I believe that their answer is most closely a rectification (then...for these purposes....a "cuboctahedron"), where, rather, the answer will be found in truncations. Why a truncation, rather than a rectification? Nature, in her Glory, has built in chaotic components, within defined ranges {depending on the component}, we see as "probabilities" and even what has been termed as the "drunkard's stagger." Decision making (whether under observable "volition" or not) remains on the organismal level, within the Adaptationist paradigm, whether or not we can define what we think we see as a "Species or Clade- Individual". That said, the determination of "Selfish Genes" as being "fallacious" may be an act of ignoring impinging attributes from the "conscious, life field" in which everything is bathed.) What will be, on a defined issue, may be set within probabilities, within defined conditions, but what will be will remain unknown until it unfolds. That said...and (I know) what a mouthful... ...while the distribution and types of organic lifeforms are undergoing constant appearance of change...through a type of "pressured chance"...this extinction event, whether later determined as "Mass" or "Background" will almost certainly leave active organic life, on this planet, once it has reached and passed its apex. The diversity will change (depending on what type of organism we speak) by number, range, distribution with associated organisms. We see species occupying niches, left open by changes in distribution of other species. It's all quite natural, whether or not we factor in anthropogenic pertubations. (We are no more really separate from the grand scheme of the biota of this planet than gametes from a sexually reproducing organism, (See: Biospheres, by Dorian Sagan), or the Oceans, in all reality, from the fluids which occupy our bodies! (See: Hypersea by McMenamin and McMenamin) The question remains - will we be found, in nearly our present "configuration," tredding water, among its wake? I have the sense that the answer to that question resides in a feature we so proudly expound on a daily basis: our decision making ability. That daily hubris will pale under the category of stewardship, either to our successful competition or ultimate demise (or significant faster "change"). Vishvasattva: The consequences of Darwin's discoveries have led to theories about the relationship between humans and primates on Earth. Various discoveries in the fossil record suggest that human beings (physically identical to modern people, +/- size) have been on Earth before any primates were here. Furthermore, evidence suggests the first humans came to Earth from space. Finally, there is no convincing archeological evidence for the aptly named "missing link" between primates and humans, suggesting that humans did not evolve from primates (and there is also some evidence that primates are the result of interbreeding between animals and men, contrary to the Divine Law). Any thoughts on this issue? Dan: Thank you for the question, and the statements which followed it. I would strongly argue that the stated present biological relationship between humans and primates is less now attributable to Darwin's Theory than it is to hard evidence by Homology. That said, I am open to whatever actual evidence may be shown in contravention to the presently accepted "theory." Scattered bits of evidence, with question of proper control and provenance, does not a theory make. "A theory is a metascientific elaboration, distinct from the results of observation but consistent with them. By means of it, a series of independent data and facts can be related and interpreted in a unified explanation." - Pope John Paul II (Pontifical Academy of Sciences, 1996) Vishvasattva: Discoveries in sediment layers from 13,000 years ago indicate the occurence of large extinctions of animals and plants in less than a single season during that time. Evidence suggests that some animals were frozen almost instantaneously, with food in their mouths and undigested food in stomachs, and that some were thrown about by a strong force (indicated by unusual spinal deformations in the animal remains throughout certain regions). Is this type of cataclysmic event linked to the Precession of the Equinoxes, and is it on the forecast for our planet during the current period of Earth changes? Dan: I have heard about that evidence, but who is to say that the animal died naturally? I interpret the occurrence about which you write, concerning that time period, the extinction of many megafauna, to have a good summation here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/stoneage/megafauna.html. Three hypotheses...no great answers...but...asking only rhetorically...why look on it all from a negative perspective? Think of the birth of languages (http://www.abc.net.au/science/news/stories/2006/1809514.htm)... I am extremely concerned, at this moment, that the present atmospheric/hydrospheric carbon loading, so-called Global Warming, is going to tip the oceanic circulation, thermal distribution, to an event triggering a temporary "intra-glacial cycle" event, mimicking a cessation of the present inter-glacial period. Vishvasattva: What can you say about the 'anachronicities' of human-related findings within the geologic record on Earth, such as fossilized tools and gold jewelry found in rock strata dating to hundreds of millions of years in the past as well as human remains and footprints dating in some cases to billions of years in the past? And what about the human skeletal remains, personal items, clothing, and tombs found worldwide, where the people buried would have to have been 9 feet, 10 feet, even 22 feet tall? Dan: Not all of such material is without provenance, and that which is not, does not necessarily have to have come from the past. Vishvasattva: Dr. Burisch, what is your opinion on the the theory that humans have been cloned and recloned on this planet when "hard times hit", for example during the Great Flood 13,000 years ago, when waves several kilometres tall washed over all the continents? Are you aware of any locations on Earth where such cloning could have taken place? Dan: Ovid recounts (http://www.livius.org/fa-fn/flood/flood4-t-ovid.html), "[253] Already had he toss'd the flaming brand, And roll'd the thunder in his spacious hand, Preparing to discharge on seas and land, But stopp'd, for fear, thus violently driv'n, The sparks should catch his axle-tree of Heav'n. Remembring in the fates, a time when fire Should to the battlements of Heaven aspire, And all his blazing worlds above should burn, And all th' inferior globe to cinders turn. His dire artill'ry thus dismiss'd, he bent His thoughts to some securer punishment: Concludes to pour a wat'ry deluge down And what he durst not burn, resolves to drown." In the context of your question, define "cloning". Do you mean a true clone (http://library.thinkquest.org/28599/cloning.htm)? [Interviewer's note: the term "cloning" was used incorrectly in the question posed by me according to the modern scientific definition of cloning. I meant the manifestation into the physical of a genetic template for human beings born onto the Earth. There is evidence that this template has been altered several times throughout the history of Man on planet Earth, which may account for height variations in unearthed human remains and changes in the human genome during the course of time.] Vishvasattva: Dr. Dan Burisch, your research into the origins of life as well as work by Niles Eldredge and Stephen Jay Gould suggests 'punctuated equilibrium,' where species on the planet appear spontaneously and already formed into specific configurations allowing them to be alive. This seems contrary to Charles Darwin's gradual natural selection theory, which postulates that life evolves gradually and manifests forms only in response to changing environmental conditions. Yet, both of these phenomena are visible throughout our world (we see several unique configurations of lifeforms as Elderedge and Gould predict, and many small variations within those configurations as Darwin predicts), so how do we reconcile these views with each other and with your own work on Lotus and other projects, which demonstrates spontaneous generation of life in a previously sterile environment? Dan: "Lotus," as far as we can tell, is neither form of Spontaneous (Equivocal) Generation: neither heterogenesis nor abiogenesis. Anagenesis has its problems...mainly gene frequencies seem to follow cladogenesis rather than phyletic change over a population, yet there is gradual change...microevolutionary processes. It's a question of scale. Natural Selection is a real thing. On the whole it functions through the Malthusian process of overproduction of young, with variation among individuals of a species - with some allowing higher fitness, and with individuals of positive variations gradually making up a greater portion of a population. If anyone looks into the fine work of Stewart Kauffman, one will quickly find that Natural Selection has been inappropriately assigned, by various individuals, to Life Origins. The panoply of life is rather attributable to autocatalytic networks, Fitness Landscapes, Natural Selection, and historical accident. We presently feel that Lotus may be either an effusive process, linked to an "origins related" autocatalytic mechanism, bearing the hallmarks of a universal constructor/copy function, yet still linked to original univocal generation, and/or the fruits of a microtechnology, whose horizon we can just now see...as one possible causation of metasystem transition. Vishvasattva: Dr. Burisch, I have a final question for you tonight. I am a young, energetic, intelligent, and inspired researcher into the frontiers of human potential and cosmic knowledge. You have had a distinguished career on the frontiers of human potential and cosmic knowledge. So, why am I doing this research alone from my apartment, and why have you only recently been liberated from the chains of secrecy and from being a political prisoner? This work needs to be done through globally connected, professional, and peaceful institutions so that there can be peer review, industrial applications, and so that people like me could get a paycheck. So, what is wrong here? What is the future for innovators and discoverers on this planet? Dan: The older I get, the less that I am sure that I know. It just so happens that Marcia and I were near an old haunt of Albert Einstein's, during the week which celebrated a confirmation of his mathematics through the famous e=mc² (simplified equation)...and we bought a refrigerator magnet with it on it, which I presently have setting in front of the WONDERFUL birthday gift she gave me (the signed EM ultrastucture book by Rhodin). At times, I look up at that magnet, and often times look at it as I walk into the office (from where I now type), and wonder - NOT BAD FOR A "PATENT CLERK"! Look, of course there should be greater cooperative effort in studying the larger (and some smaller) questions...but we'll get there. While on the way "there" we ought not think of ourselves too much in the grand scheme, as while I regard our souls to be most certainly eternal...that being our core essence...a lot of the excess energetic baggage we carry...added on to our personalities as a result of physical experience...I regard as ephemeral. Our ultimate answers will be found in our core truths...but those core truths don't amount to any singular, one of us, while slow dancing in the "mortal coil." Maybe we chose to have happen to us, what is happening? (That's why I will not relinquish myself to having been a victim of anything.) What if, that is how the Eternal, through what we are graced to perceive as individuality, has chosen to experience, as an ever unfolding act of Creation? |
| INTERVIEW WITH DR. DAN BURISCH - PART 5 (CHARLES DARWIN'S 200TH BIRTHDAY) |
| Dr. Dan Burisch, Ph.D has described himself as a professional microbiologist, former J-9 for the Majestic (pro tempore placed in the Globalist Seat), Treaty Negotiator, and H-1 for Disclosure. Dr. Burisch was a Senior Operative/Scientist responsible to the Committee of the Majority and the Majestic 12. During the 1991 Gulf War, he was assigned to a Black Ops Unit, and was deployed into the International Coalition's Zone of Operations for the purpose of counteracting a rogue military unit's intended application of unauthorized biological warfare agents against the Iraqi Army. Dr. Burisch experienced hand-to-hand combat after his helicopter was hit by enemy fire and crashed. After his return, he was ultimately assigned as "Microbiologist V" at the Papoose Lake Facility (S4) and operated as a Working Group Leader on Project Aquarius, where his responsibilities included leading scientists in investigating the neuropathy of a future human lineage extraterrestrial entity (a descendant of Earth humanity from 52,000 years in our future) known as a "J-Rod". Such investigation included being introduced into a Clean Sphere containment unit and interacting directly with the J-Rod, then processing, evaluating, and transforming tissue samples for reintroduction into the J-Rod with the intent to ameliorate that entity's pathology (http://www.danburisch.info/). Upon the adjournment of the Consistory of the Majestic 12 in 2005, Dan Burisch received orders to tell the world everything he knew from his work with future human lineage extraterrestrial entities and to publicly disclose the information learned by him during his tenure at Majestic 12 in order to benefit Humanity, the Earth, and All Beings during this crucial time for our civilization. Majestic 12 members as of adjournment in 2005 (http://www.danburisch.info/): J-1: Vice Admiral John 'Mike' McConnell J-2: Richard B. Cheney J-3: Porter Goss J-4: Admiral Bobby Ray Inman J-5: Henry Kissinger J-6: Zbigniew Brzezinski J-7: General Richard B. Myers J-8: Sir Kevin Tebbit J-9: Carol Ann Thatcher (succeeding temporary assignee Dan Burisch) J-10: Alan Greenspan J-11: Harold E. Varmus J-12: E. Kelly I, Pavel Tkalitch, have interviewed Dr. Dan Burisch for Welcome to the Universe in the public discussion forum available on the website run by Dr. Burisch and his colleague Dr. Marcia McDowell, Eagles Disobey (http://www.eaglesdisobey.net/). I am now posting selected unedited text from my discussions with Dan Burisch to do my part as a member of this civilization for the benefit of Humanity, the Earth, and All Beings. For more information, please go to the Eagles Disobey website or visit Project Camelot (http://www.projectcamelot.net/) for more interviews with Dr. Dan Burisch. This is Part 5 of the interview between myself, Pavel Tkalitch, using the handle "Vishvasattva" and Dr. Dan Burisch, Ph.D, using the handle "Dan". This interview took place on the occasion of Charles Darwin's 200th birth anniversary, February 12, 2009. |
| Copyright © 2009 pavel.tkalitch@welcometotheuniverse.com |
| DISCUSSION OF RESEARCH FINDINGS |